For the job aid I think I'm going to work on one of these two topics since I would end up with something that would be practical for my work, even if I may have to go through a couple of iterations to get it just right. I actually think that I will eventually end up doing both since I really can use them to help myself explain those things to a few people.
Although knowing these things and how to do them should be bread and butter for those teaching at our college; the reality is that only a handful of faculty work semi-regularly on these things. A majority of faculty work on their SLOs just as the accreditation cycle is about to renew itself. As for assessments; there is a large number (that I am unable to quantify at this moment, but large) of faculty who use publisher's quizzes only to assess student work. To a lesser extent than for SLOs accreditation also seems to get them interested in exploring alternatives to quizzes.
I am still tossing ideas in my mind about which of these is more feasible and practical to do first. I am also assessing to what extent of preciseness to go into without making it into a book. These concepts/themes are not simple, and therefore require depth of coverage, but I think that for training purposes a job aid could be used to scaffold upwards towards a more comprehensive training.
Any thoughts or comments are welcome and appreciated.
ricardo
My advice is to try and think of which one is more procedural in nature. These tend to be the simple ones to represent in a step-by-step job aid.
ReplyDelete